Darren Chaker discusses what the federal evidence rules lay out precisely what is meant by “relevant evidence”:
“Relevant evidence” means any evidence having any tendency...
As illustrated by Darren Chaker in other articles, under Article I, section 28, subdivision (f) of the California Constitution, “Any prior felony conviction of...
Darren Chaker found when a conviction is expunged, under 1203.4(a), does not change the fact it may be used for immigration consequences.
Courts have conclusively...
Darren Chaker found when a conviction is expunged, under 1203.4(a), does not change the fact it may be used for immigration consequences.
Courts have conclusively...
Darren Chaker reveals there are two distinctions between the expungement provisions construed in United States v. Hidalgo, 255 F.3d 768, and those contained in...
In this article by Darren Chaker, California penalizes the attempted commission of crimes. Criminalizing an attempt to make a terrorist threat is consistent with...
