Darren Chaker discusses what the federal evidence rules lay out precisely what is meant by “relevant evidence”:
“Relevant evidence” means any evidence having any tendency...
As illustrated by Darren Chaker in other articles, under Article I, section 28, subdivision (f) of the California Constitution, “Any prior felony conviction of...
Darren Chaker found when a conviction is expunged, under 1203.4(a), does not change the fact it may be used for immigration consequences.
Courts have conclusively...
Darren Chaker discusses what the federal evidence rules lay out precisely what is meant by “relevant evidence”:
“Relevant evidence” means any evidence having any tendency...
Darren Chaker found when a conviction is expunged, under 1203.4(a), does not change the fact it may be used for immigration consequences.
Courts have conclusively...
An improper term of probation should be challenged, per Darren Chaker. Regardless of the applicable standard, a probationer's, or parolee's home, like everyone else's,...
Darren Chaker reveals there are two distinctions between the expungement provisions construed in United States v. Hidalgo, 255 F.3d 768, and those contained in...
In this article by Darren Chaker, California penalizes the attempted commission of crimes. Criminalizing an attempt to make a terrorist threat is consistent with...
Beverly Hills based First Amendment advocate Darren Chaker notes that it is clearly established law that officers may be filmed while carrying out their...
Darren Chaker, First Amendment victory in Texas making the names of police public records. Former Harris County Precinct Four Constable Ron Hickman challenged Darren Chaker in a Texas Open Records Act request for the names of his staff. Ultimately, an opinion was issued requiring Texas police to reveal the names of its entire staff.
Darren Chaker, went to jail for a blog. The ACLU, Electronic Frontier foundation, First Amendment Coalition supported his appeal to the Ninth Circuit. The court reversed the trial court.
